SO_DYFAMED Time Series - 1991-> ... |
JC. MARTY : head of mission and project leader |
Diss. Org. Carbon : DOC : G. COPIN, B. AVRIL |
Get excel files : 1991-1994 1999
METHOD |
DOC Analysis (1991-1994 samples) We
mostly followed the sampling and analytical procedures presented
earlier by Copin-Montégut and Avril (1993). DOC concentrations were
obtained on discrete water samples (24 to 36 depths) after GF/F
filtration using an HTCO method that is now widely accepted (Sharp et
al., 1995). Samples were stored in 100-ml glass flasks, at 4°C
and in darkness, after addition of 0.1 ml of a saturated HgCl2
solution. The storage procedure prevents thermal and photochemical
degradations and the poisoning stage prevents any further biological
evolution of the DOM pool. The day following the cruise, samples
were filtered gently (P<150 mm Hg) on precombusted (450°C,
usually for 12 h.), prewashed (200-ml Milli-Q water) Whatman GF/F
(0.7-µm porosity) filters. The poisoning and filtration procedures
were consistent with JGOFS protocol for DOC analysis (JGOFS, 1996).
However, it is noteworthy that DOC (as practically determined)
incorporates some limited amounts of small particles and colloids
which could include some living biomass such as bacteria or viruses,
and to a smaller extent, small phytoplankters (e.g.,
prochlorophytes, and possibly cyanobacteria). Just before their
analysis, the samples were acidified to pH 2 using 0.25-ml HCl 2N
solution and purged for 10 minutes using purified (quality 45, [CO +
CO2]<2 vpm) synthetic air (20% O2) bubbling
(150-200 ml.min-1). The purging stage is required to
remove the inorganic carbon initially present in the sample. It also
largely removed the volatile organic carbon that might represent
about 5% of the initial so-called DOC. The acronym DOC thus
represents the non-purgeable 0.7–µm-filtered HTCO-analysable
organic carbon. The
analyses were performed using from 3 to 5 repetitive injections on
an automatic analyzer of Shimadzu Corp., model TOC-5000. After
catalyst conditioning and intensive washing of the catalyst with
multiple Milli-Q water injections, and when needed, regular removal
of the salty accumulation on the top of the catalyst column, the
analytical blank was typically better than 8 µM-C, mainly due to
carbon residue in Milli-Q water and to instrumental blank
(catalyst). It could be kept consistent over one-day, i.e.,
throughout the analysis of a complete set of samples, by
systematical injections of Milli-Q water before each marine sample.
The daily calibration curve was based on 2-3 standard solutions of
potassium acid phthalate (0-167 µM-C), with satisfactory regression
coefficient (usually r2>0.998). The accuracy for a
single sample was about 2 µM-C. Copin-Montégut,
G., Avril, B., 1993. Vertical
distribution and temporal variations of dissolved organic carbon in
the North-Western Mediterranean Sea. Deep-Sea Research 40(10),
1963-1972. Sharp,
J.H., Benner R., Bennett L., Carlson C.A., Fitzwater S.E., Peltzer
E.T., Tupas L.M., 1995. Analyses of dissolved organic carbon in
seawater: the JGOFS EqPac methods comparison. Marine
Chemistry 48(2), 91-108.
Determination
of dissolved organic carbon concentrations (1999 samples) Samples
for DOC analysis were collected in combusted (450°C for 4-5 h)
glass ampoules, flame-sealed immediately after collection and stored
frozen (-18°C) until analysis. The samples were not filtered as the
POC content of the samples is low at this site (< 3.6
µmol l-1
C, Copin-Montégut & Copin-Montégut 1983) and should not, therefore,
contribute significantly to the DOC values. The DOC analysis was
performed using high temperature combustion on a Shimadzu TOC-5000
total organic carbon analyser. A four-point calibration curve
(range: 0 to 200 µmol
l-1
C) was constructed for each measurement day using potassium
phthalate standards prepared fresh in UV-treated Milli-Q water. The
instrument blank was assessed using two external standards
(Certified Reference Materials, Hansell Laboratory, Bermuda
Biological Station). It was between 10 and 12
µmol l-1 C for all samples and was subtracted
from the measurements. All DOC concentrations reported are the average of three injections from
each sample.
|