Objective
3:
( 21-Jan-2004 / sB/mpT)
Objective
3 |
|
(click to go to ...) |
|
Phytoplankton community structure is a key component of ecosystem functioning because it controls
carbon export by channelling it through direct sedimentation of large or heavy
organisms, or through directing it towards the food web
The
phytoplankton community structure is sensitive to climate change and floristic
regional shifts have already been reported in relation to mixed layer depth
(MLD) shoaling and increased stratification (Karl et al., 2001). Changes in the community structure in response to
global warming could therefore profoundly affect the capacity of the biological
community to draw down atmospheric CO2 and transport it to the deep
ocean (Arrigo et al., 1999). Southern
Ocean phytoplankton are especially sensitive to direct temperature effects
because antarctic species have temperature optimum for growth ranging between 5
and 8°C (Jacques, 1983). Indirect effects via
MLD shoaling are also expected in antarctic waters due to their Fe-limited HNLC
status as the Fe content of phytoplankton
is influenced by ambient light which implies that the extent of
photoacclimation of natural populations may be constrained by the availability
of Fe (Strzepek & Price, 2000).
Changing
the dominant species of the phytoplankton assemblages could impact directly on
major nutrient use efficiency in terms of carbon export because elemental
ratios have already been shown to be species dependent. Under natural
conditions, C/N ratios can change drastically with community structure (Arrigo et al., 1999) and the same holds true
for example for Si/C ratios (Quéguiner & Brzezinski, 2002). The latter is
also known to vary with trace-element concentrations most notably iron
(Hutchins & Bruland, 1998; Takeda, 1998). The efficiency of the biological
pump at the first trophic level is then both conditioned to the dominant
species as well as by the rate of iron supply.
The structure of the phytoplankton
community also controls the production
of gases important for climate. This has been largely demonstrated with DMS.
Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) is a very labile compound, and a number of
critical steps in its cycling determine the amounts of DMSP-sulphur and carbon
that are transformed into dimethylsulfide (DMS) and can be vented to the
atmosphere. The amount of DMSP that is synthesised depends on the relative
abundance of DMSP-producing algae among primary producers. In many regions of
the open ocean, a high proportion of stronger DMSP-producers (dinoflagellates
and small haptophytes) coincides with stratified conditions in late spring and
summer rather than with seasons of active surface mixing and highest primary
production, usually dominated by diatoms, which produce less DMSP.
The
structure of the phytoplankton community has been therefore placed as a central
component in KEOPS. The general objective 3 is split into the following
sub-objectives .
3.1) Structure of phytoplankton
communities. KEOPS will address the question "what physical and chemical
factors regulate phytoplankton growth and species composition?" Detailed
topics include:
3.1.1
) Characterization of phytoplankton communities in contrasted environments.
Special attention will be paid to the major biogeochemical players: diatoms, Phaeocystis, coccolithophorids,
cryptophyceans and picoplankton.
3.1.2)
Identification, hierarchisation, and parameterization of the processes that
control the structure of the phytoplankton communities.
3.1.3)
Impact of the structure of the phytoplankton community on the fluxes of
chemical compounds that are relevant for climate.
3.1.4)
Impact of the structure of the phytoplankton community on the flux of carbon
exported below the depth of the mixed
layer
3.2) Shifts in the
structure of the phytoplankton communities in response to changes in the
forcing parameters. (KEOPS will focus on the following forcing parameters:
iron, light (visible and UV), stratification. The processes will be
investigated mainly in the surface
layer.
3.2.1) How will the forcing parameters impact the processes controlling
the production of chemical compounds that are relevant for climate?
3.2.2) How will the forcing parameters impact the processes controlling
the export of carbon below the depth of the mixed layer?
3.2.3) What is the feedback of biological activity on iron speciation?
3.3) Do biological
activity compete with photochemical processes for the production of biogenic
gases and iron speciation.
The key processes to be investigated
in 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 are limitation and co-limitation of cell growth,
respiration, grazing, remineralization, dissolution, aggregation-desegregation,
and viral lysis.
The recent data on phytoplankton nutritional limitation
in the Southern Ocean indicate a significant influence of several potentially
limiting factors. The first evidence of
the control of primary production by iron was obtained in 1988/1989 (De Baar et
al., 1990 ; Martin & Fitzwater,1990), and the importance of
vertical mixing in controlling the underwater light climate was reinforced in
1991 (Mitchell et al., 1991 ; Nelson & Smith, 1991). These limiting
factors are not independent. Iron availability has been recognised as a major
factor slowing down or even preventing the photo-adaptation of Southern Ocean
phytoplankton via pigment synthesis control (Lancelot et al., 2000). The question of the nutritional requirements of
diatoms with regard to silicon is still a matter of debate. Silicic acid
limitation of silica production has been detected at what would otherwise be
considered non-limiting silicic acid concentrations. The first estimates of
very high KS (Jacques, 1983) were obtained well before the
development of isotopic tracer studies using stable (30Si) and later
on radioactive (32Si) isotopes. More recent studies using these
modern techniques have also indicated surprisingly high KS values,
at least in areas remote from coastal/shelf influence (Caubert, 1998 ;
Quéguiner, 2001 ; Nelson et al.,
2001). Some environmental observations (Quéguiner, 2001 ; Quéguiner & Brzezinski 2002) as well
as shipboard studies (Quéguiner et al.,
in prep.) have suggested a link between in
situ low iron concentrations and high KS values and it is thus
tempting to hypothesize an iron-related control of the silicic acid uptake
mechanism similar to that for nitrate utilization or nitrogen fixation. From
these considerations it is now clear that the question of the "limiting
factor" in the Southern Ocean and elsewhere cannot be considered simply in
terms of von Liebig's law, but rather that the factors which control primary
production are multiple and interrelated, which leads to the concept of
co-limitation of phytoplankton growth by trace-elements, nutrients, and light
(Quéguiner et al., 2002). The
research proposed below fills the objectives 3 of KEOPS
a) Characterisation of the
plankton community and the composition of particulate matter.
Working
in the KEOPS study area will offer the opportunity to sample natural
phytoplankton communities in contrasting nutritional environments. We will aim
to answer to the following specific questions:
FWhat
are the characteristic phytoplankton assemblages in the different nutritional
environments? Following recommendations of the SO JGOFS synthesis group
(Tréguer & Anderson, 2002), special attention should be paid to diatoms, Phaeocystis, cocolithophorids,
cryptophyceans and picoplankton.
FWhat
are the biogeochemical characteristics of mixed layer phytoplankton assemblages
(elemental composition C/N/P/Si, pigment signatures) and how do they compare to
those of the exported material?
FHow
fast do major nutrients recycle as compared to C?
FWhat
are the ecophysiological characteristics of the dominant species with regards
to major nutrient kinetics (KS, Vmax for Si(OH)4
and NO3) and how are they affected by iron co-limitation processes?
FWhat
is the physiological state of the bulk phytoplankton assemblages and of the
individual cells with respects to photosynthetic performances?
b) The influence of change in iron concentration, light and temperature on
the composition of the plankton community and particulate
matter composition
FHow
will phytoplankton respond in terms of community adaptation, community shift, and
particulate matter composition to changes in iron supply?
FHow
will phytoplankton respond in terms of community adaptation, community shift,
and particulate matter composition to changes in mixed layer depth?
FHow
will small temperature increases (up to 2°C) of surface water will impact the
phytoplankton community and the particulate matter composition?
Heterotrophic activity is a critical link
in the cycling of photosynthetically fixed organic matter. The fate, i.e. the
export or the remineralization of organic carbon and other bioactive elements
depends, to a large extent, on the structure and functioning of pelagic food
webs. Grazing activity on primary producers is an important process for the
degradation of particulate organic matter (POM) and the subsequent transfer of
matter and energy to higher trophic levels. As described above, this process is
directly linked to phytoplankton community structure, determining whether
remineralization or sedimentation of POM prevails. The bulk of marine organic
matter (~ 90%), however, exists in the dissolved form (DOM). Different DOM
production pathways such as release during photosynthesis, cell death and
lysis, release during feeding by heterotrophs and virus-induced lysis and the
subsequent biotic and abiotic transformation processes lead to the presence of
a variety of compound classes in the marine DOM pool. Heterotrophic
bacterioplankton are the principal consumers of DOM (Azam 1983) and bacteria,
in turn, are consumed by viruses, protozoa, and metazoan grazers, thereby
transferring DOM to diverse plankton groups.
About half of marine primary production
passes through the reservoir of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and is processed
by heterotrophic bacterioplankton (Ducklow, 2000). A strong spatial and
temporal coupling between these processes has been suggested (Kirchman 1991),
however, there is increasing evidence indicating that biologically available
DOC may accumulate in the photic zone on both daily and seasonal scales
(Copin-Montégut 1993, Carlson 1994). This indicates that the factors limiting
heterotrophic bacterial activity vary spatially and temporally. Therefore, the
degree to which bacterial activity is limited by sources other than carbon
influences the coupling between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton activity.
In regard to the general objectives of
KEOPS listed above, examining heterotrophic processes
mineralisation/heterotrophy will mainly contribute to answer question 2.2. and to elucidate how perturbation of the
forcing parameters will affect the transfer of energy and matter through
heterotrophic activity. In the framework of KEOPS the focus will be to evaluate
the direct and indirect response of heterotrophic activity to iron enrichment
because the investigation in the two natural contrasting areas is particularly
suitable for this kind of studies. Besides the effect of substrate availibility
will be investigated in the two contrasting environments.
The following topics will be
addressed:
FAre bacteria indeed Fe –limited or
do they just benefit from the carbon derived from Fe stimulated of primary
production ?
FIs the response of the trophic web
(microbial and herbivorous) simply a cascade effect from phytoplankton
stimulation ?
FDoes Fe enrichment affect the
species diversity of bacteria and viruses, i.e. the standing stocks of
genetically encoded information ?
FHow is the activity/diversity of the
main bacterial players affected by Fe enrichment ?
FDoes Fe enrichment influence virus
infection of prokaryote ?
A large effort will also be made to
investigate how heterotrophy controls the production of gases.
a) Carbon dioxide: Net Community Production
(NCP) fluxes represent the balance between the processes of photosynthesis and
of respiration of the microbial community and consequently allow quantification
and qualification of the role of the biological pump of CO2
(autotrophy versus heterotrophy). Within the framework of KEOPS the major focus
will be discern wether NCP is dominated by auto- or heterotrophic processes in
the two contratsing environments. NCP will subsequently be related to the major
factors controlling community production and respiration, such as the
availability of inorganic nutrients, the amount and the biological avaibility
of particulate and dissolved organic matter and temperature.
Specific
questions are :
FAre the factors limiting bacterial
production different in the two contrasting environments?
FIs the relative significance of
bacterial production versus respiration different in the two ontrasting
environments. Does Fe fertilization subsequently impact bacterial growth
efficiency?
F What is the impact of these
processes on the transport of carbon to the deep sea ?
b) DMS and other gases relevant
for climate. |
The
concentration in the surface seawater is therefore determined by the
composition of the phytoplankton community and primary productivity, the loss
throug grazing and viral lysis, heterotrophic activity and photochemical
processes.
The same kind of complexe interactions
between various biological processes are also driving the emission of the other
biogenic gases to the atmopshere.
The related
specific questions to be addressed within the framework of KEOPS are
FWhat are the major biological processes contributing to the release of
gases in surface waters of the Southern Ocean?
FCan we provide simple parameterisations of the main processes?
Deficiency in bioavailable iron and grazing
pressure have been proposed as alternative explanations for the existence of
HNLC regions (Martin et al., 1990;
Cullen, 1991; Banse, 1992). However it seems that both explanations should be
regarded as complementary, rather than alternative (Cullen et al., 1992). When phytoplankton are Fe-limited, they are
dominated by small species that may grow at rapid but generally less than
physiologically maximal growth rate and are grazed to low stable abundances by
microzooplankton (Landry et al.,
1997). Moreover, zooplankton grazing can strongly
influence the fate of trace metals associated with phytoplankton biomass (Hutchins and Bruland, 1994; Lee and
Fisher, 1994; Hutchins et al., 1995; Barbeau et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1996). Efficient cropping of bacteria and diatoms by small
and large protistan grazers lead to a rapid remineralisation of iron and
biogenic silica. Hutchins et al. (1995) showed that about 50% of Fe assimilated by diatoms
can be regenerated by copepod grazing in the dissolved phase within few hours.
In the southern Ocean, during the in-situ
Fe fertilisation experiment (SOIREE, Boyd
et al., 2000), Bowie et al. (2001) showed that 60% and 10% of Fe assimilated by
phytoplankton were regenerated by micrograzers and copepods, respectively, and
that Fe regeneration by grazers was tightly coupled to uptake by phytoplankton
and bacteria. Fe can also be regenerated in the dissolved phase by viral lysis
(Gobler et al., 1997). Viruses are a major cause of mortality for
microorganisms (Bergh et al., 1989). They are present in surface seawater at
concentrations of >104 to 108 viruses ml-1
(Bratbak et al., 1994), and may release more than 10% of ambient Fe
concentrations (Gobler et al., 1997). In some environments, where new sources of Fe to
the surface waters are low, biologically regeneration of Fe could be a major
process in the biogeochemical cycle of
Fe and may therefore help to relieve Fe limitation (Barbeau et al., 1996). To date, however, no studies have investigated the
speciation and bioavailability of Fe regenerated by biological activity in the
Southern Ocean. In order to better understand and quantify the feed-back of
biological activity on the biogeochemical cycling of Fe, we propose, to address the following questions in the framework of KEOPS.
F How do small and large protistan grazers contribute to iron
remineralisation?
F How do these organisms influence Fe speciation and bioavailability in
seawater?
F How does viral lysis influence iron speciation and bioavailability in
seawater?
F How does
heterotrophic bacterial activity influence the iron speciation and
bioavailability in seawater?
F Does heterotrophic bacterial and grazer activity have a significant
impact on the production and/or destruction of specific organic iron-ligands?
Stratospheric ozone
depletion and the resulting increase in solar short-wavelength ultraviolet (UV)
radiation have stimulated research on the possible effects of UV radiation on
aquatic ecosystems. The seasonal ozone depletion has been observed to be most
pronounced over Antarctica, suggesting that UV radiation is an important
physical variable in this marine environment. UVB radiation accounts for only <
1% of the total radiation intensity reaching the Earth’s surface, nevertheless,
it is a highly reactive component of sunlight. Direct exposure to UV radiation
has been shown to be detrimental to aquatic organisms (Herndl, 1993, Cullen,
1994, Sommaruga, 1996). Exposure to UV radiation has been shown to be
detrimental to aquatic organisms (Herndl, 1993, Cullen, 1994, Sommaruga, 1996).
Solar radiation can
significantly impact the biogeochemical cycling of carbon and other important
elements such as nitrogen, phosphate, sulfur and different trace elements (see
review by Mopper and Kieber 2000). In the context of carbon cycling the two
major processes identified thus far are the direct loss of DOC due to
photomineralization (Salonen and Vähätalo 1994; Miller and Zepp 1995; Graneli
et al. 1996) and photochemical transformations of dissolved organic matter
(DOM) thereby affecting the subsequent biological mineralization of DOC (see
review by Kieber 2000). It has become evident that the source and therefore the
composition of DOM determine to a large extent the impact of photochemical
processes on the loss and turnover of DOC. Recent studies clearly demonstrate
that the biological reactivity of DOM following exposure to irradiation is
inversely related to its biological reactivity prior to irradiation (Benner and
Biddanda 1998; Obernosterer et al. 1999; Tranvik and Bertilsson 2001). This
indicates that initially biologically reactive DOM can be rendered biologically
more resistant upon exposure to solar radiation, while DOM of initially low
biological reactivity can be, at least partly, photochemically transformed to
compounds of higher biological reactivity. The impact of increasing UV
radiation on these photo-induced processes still needs to be established.
In addition to the impact of photochemical
processes on the carbon cycle, they could also be important for the control of
the production of other gases. For example,
laboratory have shown that the photo-degradation of dissolved organic
carbon (DOC) was the likely process responsible for at least the production of alkenes in surface
seawater. This is also confirmed studies of Bonsang et al. (1992) on the
production of unsaturated hydrocarbons in seawater.
Light driven transformations can also
result in a dramatic shift in steady state soluble iron in marine waters.
Photoredox behavior of Fe(III) in marines waters its likely associated with
absorbtion of light by Fe(III)-organic chromophores resulting in the production
of Fe(II) species. (Waite 2001). Recently it has been demonstrated that
photolysis of Fe(III)-siderophores complexes leads to the formation of
lower-affinity Fe(III) ligands and the reduction of Fe(III) (Barbeau et al. 2002). The photochemistry of
Fe(III) macrocyclic complexes, especially those with porphyrin-type ligands
have been extensively studies but no further studies have been carried out in
seawater.
During KEOPS, we will focus on the
following specific questions
FHow does solar radiation influence the
bioavailability of iron?
FDoes solar radiation have a significant
impact on the production and/or destruction of specific organic iron-ligands
FHow does photodegradation does influence
the production of gases?
OVERALL | |
> Scientific aims | |
> Research
plan & calendar |
|
>
Researchers & labs & publications |
|
DATA | > Open Access Data login |
> List / Map Stations | |
> Log & Basic files | |
> List Parameters | |
> Data NOT in Bank | |
> Statistics archived data | |
> Real-time satellite imagery | |
BIBLIOGRAPHY | |
> Publications | |
PROJECT LIFE | |
> Special issue DSRII | |
> Other Journals | |
> OS Meeting (2006) | |
> Log book | |
> Meetings
Cruise Reports |
|
19 juin, 2009
© mpTorre/PROOF |
|